Fr John Zuhlsdorf offers a quote from Pope Leo XIV on Giovanni Pierluigi da Palestrina, the greatest composer of the Renaissance. It should gladden the hearts of Catholic music lovers everywhere, especially those dismayed at the present offerings in many of their churches.
Perhaps it’s overly optimistic, but if the Holy Father were to offer a few words stressing the importance of the people hearing a least a small sampling of the rich heritage of Catholic music, it might give impetuous to parishes to improve their music of the mass.
“His compositions, solemn and austere, inspired by Gregorian chant, closely unite music and liturgy, both giving prayer a sweeter expression and encouraging unanimity, and enriching the sacred rites with greater solemnity.”
To be sure, much of the music of Palestrina and other greats may be beyond the reach of the typical small, amateur choir, but there is much superb music available that is suitable for smaller forces (music composed for Anglican church choirs can be a valuable resource).
Bad news for, “Pride” organizations, GLAAD, and others. Good news for the children.
From PJ Media:
BREAKING: Supreme Court Delivers a Crushing Blow to Trans Agenda
In a resounding victory for parental rights and child protection, the Supreme Court delivered a 6-3 decision Wednesday that upholds Tennessee’s ban on so-called “gender-affirming care” for minors. This landmark ruling represents a triumph of common sense over radical gender ideology that has been targeting America’s children for far too long.
It’s beyond the poor powers of this blogger, understanding how the alleged proponents of equal rights for all, particularly tran-sexuals, can sincerely believe young, pre-adolescent children have the ability to decide what sex they are, as well the “right” to undergo surgery and harsh medication to alter their themselves permanently. It brings to mind Dr Josef Mengele and his staff’s brutal experiments on imprisoned Jews in Hitler’s Germany. The sadistic perpetrators of those unspeakable acts had nary a concern for their victims’s rights. Their 21st-century equivalents get around that charge by applying their own grotesque beliefs onto young children to justify their mutilation of them.
The fact that opponents of these hideous acts had to go to the highest court in the land to allow states to ban them (not all states have), and that even three of the nine justices opposed it, speaks volumes concerning the collapse of morals in our country.
Additionally, today’s Supreme Court’s ruling does not mean the end of “gender-affirming care,” a euphemism for the ages, in the US. The mutilation of young children to satisfy the whims of their demented elders is still with us and will be for some time. As PJ news puts it,
Of course, the fight isn’t over. The radical left won’t give up its crusade to confuse and mutilate America’s children just because the Supreme Court dealt them a major blow. There are still battles to fight in schools, sports, and countless other institutions that this gender ideology has infected
Still, there is at least some hope that opponents of so-called “gender-affirming care,” who greatly outnumber supporters of it, will eventually see true justice for all to prevail. Pray that it is so. Amen.
But 80 of them are far too many. Furtwängler, one of the greatest conductors of the 20th century, like many conductors, had ambitions of being a composer, but his conducting talent took away from him the time needed to put pen to manuscript.
Eventually, though, Furtwängler did have enough time for composing, plenty of it. Unfortunately, that was owing to losing all his conducting engagements, post-war, because of his refusal to leave his beloved Germany for the entire war. His critics said he was too cozy with the Nazi government and aquiescing to their murderous regime. Not so, says BBC music critic Stephen Johnson, in his excellent and detailed booklet notes. There were many instances of Furtwängler saving the lives of Jews and others from the Nazi slaughter, making him an enemy of the regime, which he despised. Nevertheless, he served as a status symbol for the Nazis and was left alone on that account. By staying in his beloved Germany instead of getting out, though, Furtwängler destroyed his career, though it did recover somewhat in the recording studio before his death.
So, how does Furtwängler’s Second Symphony hold up? Not too well. As alluded to above, it is simply too long, though length is not necessarily a drawback, as Mahler, a great admirer of Furtwängler, proves. The problem is what happens between that first and 80th minute. Furtwängler gives us some lovely themes, but too often lets them run on, as if the composer feared to come to a cadence, lest he be unable to imagine any more ideas. Happily for the composer, less so, the listener, he does, but all too plentifully.
It’s a pity, though. There is much good music in this symphony, and if Furtwängler or someone else had managed to edit it down to half its present length, it would be a far more viable composition. In those 80 minutes, there is a fine symphony lurking.
The excellent Neeme Järvi does his level best to hold the work together, but despite his superb conducting, is unable to do so.
In the end, Furtwängler was wise to keep his daytime job.
A pleasant surprise, though, in this recording is the excellent playing of the Estonian National Symphony Orchestra, not well known to this writer, though the orchestra celebrates its 100th anniversary this year. Let up hope there will be more recordings forthcoming from this ensemble and Chief Conductor Järvi, on Chandos, if possible, which provides its usual superb sound.
Furtwängler (1886-1954): Symphony No. 2 in E Minor
Multiple aid workers were killed after a bus was attacked in Gaza on Wednesday night, according to a US-backed humanitarian aid organization which accused Hamas of carrying out the assault.
Many naïve fools in so-called humanitarian aid organizations are well-to-do Americans, and it requires no research to learn their political leanings. It’s a peculiar phenomenon of the US Left, its reflexive sympathizing with our enemies, as well as Israel’s in this case. Many of them, in their willful ignorance, will coo words empathetic to violent extremists, fantasizing that they will cause the latter to see them as friends. The enemy, on the other hand, sees them as Americans, to be dealt with accordingly. The do-gooders never seem to learn that basic truth.
Relatedly, the purported justification of these idiots is that they are opposed to violence and only wish to assist peaceful Palestinians, not terrorists groups like Hamas. Yet for decades, the Palestinians have harbored violent anti-Israel groups. That does not necessarily make them accessories to violent acts, but they do contort themselves looking the other way from the violent acts of the terrorists in their midst.
If the “peaceful” Palestinians truly wished to rid themselves of terrorists from their land, there’s no doubt the Israeli government would be more than happy to assist them in any way.
This time, it’s Lutherans heading toward oblivion, but it’s more complicated than the Church of England’s collapse.
There isn’t only one Lutheran Church; in fact, there are dozens of them, resulting from schism after schism, and other reasons. There are, however, three main branches, and one of them, the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ECLA), is the faltering branch. Students of churches heading to the dustbin of history should have no trouble guessing why. The venerable commentator Bill Donahue, President of the Catholic League, explains it to those who have yet to guess it.
As we have noted many times before, the more “progressive” a religious organization is, the less members it tends to have. This is certainly true of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America (ELCA). It was formed in 1988 when three Lutheran denominations merged amidst disagreements with more traditional-minded Lutheran denominations.
To say that the ECLA is not “traditional-minded” is a whopping understatement. Mr Donahue provides the savory details concerning the beliefs of the ECLA.
The ELCA rejects the Christian definition of marriage, namely the union of a man and a woman. Instead, it believes in gay marriage, the union of two people of the same sex who are barred by nature from creating a family. It also rejects what science teaches about the sexes, which is that sex in binary—one is either a man or a woman. Instead, it believes the fiction that the sexes are interchangeable.
Hoo, boy! That’s quite a curriculum those swingin’ Lutherans offer. You have to wonder how their creed is worded, if they have one. Getting down to the numbers below will obviate any further explications concerning the soon-to-be late Evangelical Lutheran Church in America.
In 1988, when the ELCA was born, it had 5,251,534 members. In 2020, the figure was 3,142,777. Its own Office of Research and Evaluation determined in 2022 that it will have fewer than 16,000 worshippers left on an average Sunday by 2041. This is happening despite a desperate attempt to be “proactive in evangelism and outreach.” This led one Lutheran observer to conclude that “according to current trend’s, the church will basically cease to exist within the next generation.
Many Protestant churches in America are likely to share a fate similar to the ECLA, but not all of them. Conservative and evangelical churches will likely be with us for some time. It is all but certain though, that mainstream Protestant denominations professing liberal or left-wing beliefs, including the Presbyterian Church USA and the United Methodist Church, are likely over time to see their worshipers dwindle to insignificance, leading to their church going extinct. Liberalism simply doesn’t sell.
The Church of England is in its dying days, according to the estimable Dr David Virtue of Virtue on Line. That said, this writer has been hearing the death knell for the C of E for as long as he can recall, so could this finally be the end? It could be. There is compelling evidence backing up these latest predictions of the Church of England’s coming demise.
One disastrous, but also typical move of the Church’s own doing, is the all-but-certain election of an Iranian-born refugee who could be the first female archbishop of Canterbury in the C of E’s 1428 year history, which is bound to lose the church even more of its few remaining worshipers. Virtue quotes an unnamed source, presumably well-connected and in the know, who says: “Like a wounded Serengeti lion, the death of the Church of England is only a matter of time.”
“They are playing chess on the deck of the Titanic. There are just three orthodox members – one clergy, two lay out of 17 people in the selection process. The Good Ship Lambeth is about to go the same way as The Episcopal Church, led to the cliff’s edge by [Archbishop] Welby, and pushed.”
“It is all over. Welby filled the House of Bishops with his liberal management stooges. They voted for the Living in Love and Faith (LLF) report, without going through the legal requirements for any change, and they will get one of their own for ABC. Someone who ticks as many diversity boxes as possible has the best chance.”
More evidence the C of E is done for is that only 1.5 percent of the English populace attends Sunday services, a good indication the institution has had it.
So what’s to become of the Church of England when she closes her gates for good? This blogger believes the best solution for the C of E is to right the wrong of 491 years ago when the half-mad King Henry VIII broke with Rome because Pope Clement VII wouldn’t grant him an annulment of his marriage to Catharine of Aragon. It was on that rickety foundation that the Church of England was founded, and with a foundation like that, it was bound to fail. It has taken nearly 500 years, but it now appears the ill-founded institution has finally reached the end. Now, the one and only thing that can save England’s church is to reunite with Rome.
Happily, there is an already existing means in the Catholic Church that would serve as a new home for the English Church, the Personal Ordinariate of Our Lady of Walsingham, which is part of the Anglican Ordinariate. Founded in 2011, its purpose is to be a means for former Anglicans in England, America, and elsewhere to become Catholics, but still maintain many of the wonderful institutions of the Anglican Church, including its marvelous liturgy and music.
No doubt many observant Church of England worshipers would blanch at having to pray for the Pope, but when the C of E does finally collapse, and an accord can be reached merging the two institutions, an admittedly enormous task, those loath to embrace the Bishop of Rome may have second thoughts.
A friend passed along a fine piece from the Free Press, by Madeline Kearns, with the otherwise dreadful title, How Catholicism Got Cool. The story relates the happy news that there is an increasing popularity of Catholicism among the young, resulting in a boom in adult baptisms. A couple of examples from Kearns’s report:
The Diocese of Lansing in Michigan reported a 30 percent spike from the previous year, 633 converts, which is the highest they’ve seen in over a decade. Father Ryan Kaup, at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln’s Catholic center, baptized 20 students alone—“the highest we’ve ever had”—and gave rites of initiation to an additional 50 who were coming into the church from other Christian denominations.
This phenomenon is not just limited to the US. Churches in France and the UK are reporting similar and substantial upticks in adult baptisms.
The reasons for this startling increase in baptisms and confirmations into the Catholic Church are varied and many. Starting at the top, appropriately, Kearns cites our new Pope, Leo XIV,“who church leaders hope will turbocharge the country’s Catholic boom (the hyperlink leads to a Fox News report reporting precisely that).
Otherwise, Kearns’s story presents several touching accounts of various young Catholic converts, who tell their varied stories of how they found their way to Holy Church and what, in particular, attracted them to H⁷er: the ceremony, ritual, fellowship, the Sacrament of Reconcilliation (confession), and even the music(!) to some, caused them to explore Catholocism more deeply, leading them, eventually, to RICA, the Rite of Christian Initiation of Adults (or, as it was called long ago, “adult baptism”). From there, they received instruction and, in time, became full-fledged communicants of the Holy Catholic Church. This writer must admit, even a few years ago, he would not have expected to see an article of this nature.
Notwithstanding the many uplifting accounts of some of Holy Church’s newest communicants, regrettably, there is a surprising and substantial fault in this report, an omission, which is thus: nowhere in these accounts are any mentions of what raises Holy Church above all others, and that is the Real, or Actual Presence of out Lord in the Eucharist. No protestant denomination can make that claim. In fact, it is for that reason alone that I made the decision many years ago to become a Catholic. As a matter of fact, a few years ago I told the story of my conversion in this blog, and, gentle reader, with your forbearance (and because of a certain slothfulness in me), I am republishing a relatively short excerpt of it below. If you read it back then, by all means, skip over it, but I am hopeful those who have not read it before will gain important insight into such a vital element of Catholic worship. Here goes:
Some years ago, Good Friday, I was seated in a pew at my beloved Anglo-Catholic parish in Manhattan, the Church of the Resurrection, E. 74th St. The Mass of the Pre-Sanctified was being celebrated. For those not in the know, it is a liturgy long ago removed from the Catholic Missal, having been abolished in the reforms of 1955. It is, however, still celebrated by Anglo-Catholics.
During the mass, I was marvelling at the beauty of it, the chants, the clouds of billowing incense, and the celebrants resplendent in their black vestments. Then something strange happened. Amid the glory and pomp, I distinctly heard a voice, not mine, in my head say to me: “Jesus is not here.” I was startled by that, and after mass pondered the meaning of it while riding the uptown train to Washington Heights, where I lived. I continued to ponder it for quite some time after.
One day, while walking down Ninth Avenue in Hell’s Kitchen to my job, I again heard a voice in my head, but this time it was clearly mine, and it solved the mystery I had been pondering all the while. The voice told me: “You have to go to Rome.”
What was clear to me hearing “Jesus is not here” from that unrecognized voice (though I have speculated whom it might have been), Despite all the glorious trappings and, especially for me, the spectacular music in my little Church, music that towered over the offerings of most small Catholic churches, Our Lord was not there and that absence made me realize, sadly, it was time to leave it for one where He cound be found.
A Catholic parish that serves as an ecumenical parish, [St Bede’s in Williamsburg, VA] with the Episcopal (Anglican) community allowed the ‘ordination’ of a female Episcopal “priest” inside the shared worship space and then accepted her as co-pastor.
Notwithstanding the bizarre event that took place in this incident, Bickerstaff assumed a Catholic Church allowing Protestant services to take place in it violated Church law in some capacity or another. Not so, surprisingly. The Directory for the Application of Principles and Norms on Ecumenism by the Pontifical Council on Christian Unity, paragraph 137 (1992), states in part:
[If] priests, ministers or communities not in full communion with the Catholic Church do not have a place or the liturgical objects necessary for celebrating worthily their religious ceremonies, the diocesan Bishop may allow them the use of a church or a Catholic building and also lend them what may be necessary for their services.
With that cleared up, let’s turn to the fun part of this event. According to LifeSite News,
Just before the start of a February 16 Sunday worship service . . . that featured a Catholic Mass immediately followed by Kirk-Clunan’s first Episcopal “Eucharist” as a “priest,” a laywoman reading parish announcements congratulated the Episcopalian on her “ordination.” There followed immediate applause from the ecumenical congregation. The announcer also encouraged the congregants to stay for both liturgies to promote “Christian unity.”
So, the Bishop, His Grace Barry Knestout and Monsignor Joseph P. Lehman of St Bede’s okayed this craziness and apparently no rules were violated. Moreover, Bishop Knewstout permitted the ordination of a female Episcopal bishop in 2020, showing that he is just ducky about such ecuminism. Still, what kind of impression does this tell the pewsitters, in St Bede and others, about the sanctity of Catholic teachings; that whatever whacky acts the Episcopal Church may engage in, while strictly against Catholic teachings, are nonetheless tolerated by the Church when taking place in a consecrated setting? Has Msgr Lehman at any time explained to his parishioners that what the Episcopalians are doing in their church is by no means acceptable to the Catholic Church?
It seems to Bickerstaff that ecumenism is merely another word for relativism or moral equivalency, where passing judging on other ideologies is frowned upon. Pope Leo XIV might want to have a long look at The Directory for the Application of Principles and Norms on Ecumenism by the Pontifical Council on Christian Unity and see if some major changes can be made in a document, which dates from a different time in our Church. Or, maybe, simply consigning the whole thing to the Papal dumpster.
THE TAOS TATLER. 